Search This Blog

Monday, August 24, 2009

How to Choose an Engineering College

Summer is the time for a lot of stress amongst school leaving students and their parents. They are terribly confused regarding the college they should join for higher studies. They don't know enough about various options, and that adds to the stress. Media tries to help by publishing rankings of colleges. However, there are several problems with those rankings. Most rankings are only for the top few institutes. Also, rankings are based mostly on perceptions, and on unverifiable data supplied by the Institutions themselves. Many times, they use parameters unrelated to quality (like size). Further, they rank the entire institution, and not a specific program.

Students (and parents) typically look at last year's closing ranks, which means that they miss out on new and exciting places. Or they look at placement data narrowly (even if one student got a Rs. 10 lakh job, the institute must be good). And another bias is that government colleges are better than private colleges. Some NITs are excellent, and a large number of private institutions offer poor quality education. But there are many private institutions with much better faculty profile than NITs.

So, what should students do. The solution is simple. They should do their own research and come up with their own rankings.

In my opinion, the quality of education is primarily driven by quality of faculty. So, if there is only one thing that you want to check in a college website, it is the quality of faculty. You should look for not just the number of faculty members, but also their qualifications, whether they are PhD or not, where did they study, are they active researchers and publishing.

The second most important criteria is the academic freedom that the Institution has. In IITs, NITs, IIITs, and deemed universities, there is complete academic freedom to change curriculum, provide flexibility to students, have their own exams, etc. To faculty, it is very demoralizing that someone else will test what they have taught to their students, and generally speaking (with some exceptions), quality of teaching is better in institutions who have their own exams.

Of course, having freedom does not mean that it will always be used effectively. So, one has to look for more information. Third most important criteria is the curriculum. Do they change it frequently enough. Judging the curriculum will be difficult for a student of, so seek help from a person in that discipline. For example, in Computer Science, if they teach you multiple programming languages, they are more interested in spoon feeding than teaching concepts. In general, and this is counter-intuitive, better departments will have fewer courses in the curriculum. Weaker departments would like to spoon feed you a lot of information in the hope that you can say something when it comes to placement interview. Also, more flexible system would have more electives, and you would be studying topics of your interest. Of course, make sure that those electives are actually offered, and are not just on paper.

Other parameters are less important in my opinion, but do matter. These include infrastructure. How many labs, how many PCs, what is their library holdings, how much is the Internet bandwidth, sports facilities, etc. Another parameter is what happens to the students after they graduate. This includes campus placement, but more importantly, how many of them go for higher education. Remember, the most important skill that college education is supposed to impart is to learn how to learn. If a college is successfully imparting that skill, then it must result in substantial number of students to think about higher studies. And finally, brand equity does matter. Have they got any ranking in any survey. What is the closing rank of last year. Have they been accredited.

Now give weights to these parameters, and start surfing the web to collect relevant information. This is hard work, but remember, you are about to take the most critical decision of your life. Don't depend on others advice alone. Have your own research to back up your decision.


Unknown said...

I fully agree with your view. Just think that when the 'political authorities' can keep quota for so called underprivileged ones (SC, ST and OBC etc), why we academicians cannot take steps to apply similar procedure for what you suggested that is more socially favorable and in fact, is the need of hour.

Vishu said...

Sir, though what you are saying is completely correct there are few setbacks you have ignored:

1. Quality of PhD: I have seen a number of people doing a PhD who dont know even the basic stuffs. Graduates are treated in India as cheap labors to do experiments in labs.

2. You mentioned about publishing. This is again not complete in itself. I have a number of papers in my career that dont say anything new. Infact most are just repitions of previous works, just repeated in a different way and at a different conference. The number may not be a significant criteria, one should count quality papers like IEEE, Nature, Science types of papers. Just the number is not a complete guide in itself. I hate to say this, but I have seen IIT papers also which are not worth praising. I have heard that papers are also published based on professor's reputations. (correct me if I am wrong, I have just listened to it but I somehow agree after seeing the quality of papers)

3. You have completely missed out the point that most of the parents dont know what is a good paper, what is a good PhD etc etc. You are very expert and it would be nice if you could mention some of the guidelines for deciding it.

4. About the flexibility, while I was at IIT, even though flexibility was mentioned but I had to choose some of the courses which were not appealing just because there were timing clashes. And I think they said that as per new rules, professors cannot change timing themselves nowadays(in my time it used to be completly on professors and I guess that is essential)

4. Last but not the least, increase awareness about your blog..[:P]

Nikki said...

Sir, your article clearly depicts how you managed to create and maintain a great learning culture at LNMIIT. I am from Y09 batch and have been working in the IT industry since July 2013. But I now see where does my craving to learn and go for higher studies come from!

I have appeared for GATE twice while continuing my job, and I have always wondered why earning from job isn't satisfying to me like it is to my friends. And here I have the answer. The LNMIIT culture has instigated that keen desire to learn and delve deeper into subjects.

All I want to say is, choosing B.Tech from LNMIIT has been one of the best decisions of my life because I have "learned to learn" here and that's probably going to take me far in life... :)